Die Evidenz hinter
dem myoact EMG-System.
Ein strukturierter Überblick über wichtige Studien zu neuromuskulären Dysbalancen, Aktivierungsdefiziten und Effektstärken von EMG-Biofeedback — von Rückenschmerz bis zur Neurorehabilitation.
ICC 0,940
Hohe Test-Retest-Reliabilität
Validierung an oberflächlichen Muskelgruppen (Burandt 2025)
UT:LT 3,15
Erkennung neuromuskulärer Dysbalancen
quantifiziert Scapula-Dyskinesie bei Impingement (Smith 2009)
g = 0,60
Positive Wirkung EMG-Biofeedback
Schmerzreduktion bei CLBP, stabil nach 8 Monaten (Sielski 2017)
60,6 %
Relevanz für die klinische Entscheidung
EMG verändert Behandlungspfad bei Patienten (Krause 2020)
Studien-Archiv
4 Studien gefunden
Janda-Klassifikation: Upper & Lower Crossed Syndrome
Etabliert das Modell fazilitierter VS.
inhibierter Muskelgruppen: UCS zeigt fazilitierte obere
Trapeziusmuskeln/SCM/Pektoralis bei inhibierten tiefen Zervikalfleyoren und Serratus anterior.
Movement System Impairment (MSI) Modell
Schmerz entsteht durch repetitive, nicht-ideale Bewegungsmuster. Klassifikation nach Richtung der Bewegungsstörung; relative Steifigkeit, Muskelkraft und neuromuskuläre Aktivierung als beitragende Faktoren.
Corrective Exercises for Upper Crossed Syndrome
RCT confirms Janda's model: Corrective exercises significantly improve muscle activation patterns and posture in UCS patients — supports the tonic/phasic concept.
CONCLUSION
RCT confirms Janda's model: Corrective exercises significantly improve muscle activation patterns and posture in UCS patients — supports the tonic/phasic concept.
CONCLUSION
RCT confirms Janda's model: Corrective exercises significantly improve muscle activation patterns and posture in UCS patients — supports the tonic/phasic concept.
EEG–EMG, MEG–EMG and EMG–EMG frequency analysis: physiological principles and clinical applications
The fact that muscle discharge tends to be rhythmic has been known for 200 years. William Wollaston, using a precursor of the stethoscope, was the first to describe this in 1810 (Wollaston, 1810). He determined the rhythm to be in the beta band by comparing the pitch of the sound picked up over his muscles with that from a horse drawn carriage driven over the cobbled streets of London at different speeds
CONCLUSION
The fact that muscle discharge tends to be rhythmic has been known for 200 years. William Wollaston, using a precursor of the stethoscope, was the first to describe this in 1810 (Wollaston, 1810). He determined the rhythm to be in the beta band by comparing the pitch of the sound picked up over his muscles with that from a horse drawn carriage driven over the cobbled streets of London at different speeds. A century later, the pioneering German neurophysiologist, Hans Piper, delineated a further modulation of motor unit discharge in the low gamma band, at around 40 Hz (Piper, 1907, Piper, 1912). However, it was not until the early 1990s that the first evidence emerged supporting a central origin for motor unit synchronisation in humans (McLachlan and Leung, 1991, Farmer et al., 1993) and other primates (Murthy and Fetz, 1992, Murthy and Fetz, 1996a, Murthy and Fetz, 1996b, Sanes and Donoghue, 1993).
CONCLUSION
The fact that muscle discharge tends to be rhythmic has been known for 200 years. William Wollaston, using a precursor of the stethoscope, was the first to describe this in 1810 (Wollaston, 1810). He determined the rhythm to be in the beta band by comparing the pitch of the sound picked up over his muscles with that from a horse drawn carriage driven over the cobbled streets of London at different speeds. A century later, the pioneering German neurophysiologist, Hans Piper, delineated a further modulation of motor unit discharge in the low gamma band, at around 40 Hz (Piper, 1907, Piper, 1912). However, it was not until the early 1990s that the first evidence emerged supporting a central origin for motor unit synchronisation in humans (McLachlan and Leung, 1991, Farmer et al., 1993) and other primates (Murthy and Fetz, 1992, Murthy and Fetz, 1996a, Murthy and Fetz, 1996b, Sanes and Donoghue, 1993).